Discussion Excerpts

Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content

First and Third Person Narratives   

     My example is third-person narrator, one who is both limited and unreliable. These are the opening lines of the novel's story, which begins in chapter two, after an author's introduction in chapter one:

     "Listen: Billy Pilgrim has come unstuck in time. Billy has gone to sleep a senile widower and awakened on his wedding day. He has walked through a door in 1955 and come out another one in 1941. He has gone back through that door to find himself in 1963. He has seen his birth and death many times, he says, and pays random visits to all the events in between.

     Billy is spastic in time, has no control over where he is going next, and the trips aren't necessarily fun. He is in a constant state of stage fright, he says, because he never knows what part of his life he is going to have to act in next."

Kurt Vonnegut. Slaughterhouse-Five. 1969.

 

Research and Discussion Board Post: Watts in the 1960s

     Imagine being twelve like Walter Mosely was at the time, with all this going on right there in his community... I see the story Little Scarlet as probably being very cathartic for him; a way to deal with some of these ghosts from his past.

     Here's a photo of the author (as a child) in front of his Watts home. I would guess that is his father standing with him. I'll share an excerpt from the quote about his father I shared in the group post: "My father was sitting in a chair in the living room, which he never did, drinking vodka and just staring. And I said, Dad, what's wrong? He says, you know, Walter, I want be out there. I want to be out there rioting and shooting, he says, but I know it's wrong"...  You can see the despair in the young Walter's face and body language.

     Mosely has said that the Watts riots were like "a virus that made people suddenly unafraid of the consequences of standing up for themselves." http://books.usatoday.com/book/walter-mosley-little-scarlet/r106774 (Links to an external site.)

     Here is a link from NPR where you can hear Mosely talk about it in an interview:

http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2015/08/14/432084376/walter-mosley-watts-riots-paved-the-way-for-a-lot-of-change  (It's under 4 minutes and well worth it).

                                                                   

Evaluating Little Scarlet

     Just as an exercise, and to keep the discussion varied, I'll try evaluating Little Scarlet from the "pleasure" perspective. There's not a lot of it in the novel, I think we'd all agree. The setting is fairly grim, Watts in the aftermath of racial tensions and rioting, and the main character Ezekiel "Easy" Rawlins is reluctant to even get involved in the murder investigation. The reasons that the police want it resolved are more about keeping control over a tense environment than any real concern for the dead black girl, and Easy sees that ugly truth. He finally decides that he will get involved, for the sake of "his people." You could say he sees the prospect of some pleasure there, some pride in doing a noble deed.

     There was some pleasure in reading the story for me, although I'm with the side of the class that enjoyed The Murder of Roger Ackroyd more. I enjoyed the main character, Easy, and his way of handling the various conflicts he encountered. He took some joy in taunting the white policemen and detectives that gave him a hard time. He had the smoking vice, a presumably healthy sex life with his wife (along with an eye for other ladies such as Juanda), children at home that he loved. All in all, a believable character, with some admitted flaws, that takes what joy he can day to day.

     Notably absent is the (over-used anyway) happy ending. It's more bittersweet, but that's a realistic reflection of the story's overall setting and plot. As Easy notes, in the final chapter. "There was no coverage of the nearly forty funerals held in memory of those who died" (321). The news had moved on to other topics. His last bit of pleasure, even though denying himself a more sensual one available, is his gift of money to Juanda to help better her life.

 

A Postmodern Work

     As a semi-professional guitarist I have to offer an example of postmodern music. Not necessarily a modern band, but one of my favorites, and their work was fairly intellectual for the era, and even in retrospect- The Police. (Sting, Andy Summers, and Stewart Copeland).

     Using the characteristics from our module lesson on postmodernism (which was one of the better concise definitions I've seen), here's how they qualify in my opinion.

1. Reference, either direct or implicit, to some earlier version or style.

     The Police referenced two distinct earlier styles of music when they first emerged: punk and reggae. "Roxanne" is a good example of both; the verses have a reggae feel and then the chorus is more "punk" and rough-edged. Those same qualities are present in most of their early compositions.

2. Commentary on that style, often ironic or playful—sometimes critical.

     Unlike roots-reggae, (Bob Marley for example) which focused on mostly spiritual and social issues; or punk which had a great disdain for anything "establishment" (including excessive talent in music) The Police paid tribute to the forms of these music genres but substituted their own lyrical messages. "Don't Stand So Close to Me" has about the same mix of reggae and punk influences as "Roxanne". But the lyrics are about a tempting but forbidden underage female student in a male teacher's class. (Based somewhat on Sting's real-life experiences as a teacher). It even references Lolita, "that book by Nabokov." The musicianship is excellent, totally unlike punk.

3. Critique rather than assertion; that is, the postmodern move is often to offer criticism and less often to suggest solutions.

     This is a little harder to apply to music, but I think their big hit "Every Breath You Take" fooled many people on first listen- it sounded like a heartfelt love song. It was, in fact, a song expressing bitter revenge over a failed romantic relationship. The "I'll be watching you" is from the perspective of a stalker, not a lover. A postmodern critique of love songs? Yes, I think it is.

4. Playful, or ironic, relationship with audiences or viewers.

     The Police (and Sting was their mastermind) demanded a little more of their audience, I think, or at least offered multiple layers of meaning for those who could discern them. Their huge album Synchronicity was based on a concept of psychologist Carl Jung's; "Wrapped Around Your Finger" references Homer's The Odyssey; and this was the norm of their lyrics (and album titles) rather than the exception. Rock/pop music was never known for being very intellectual, and The Police challenged that stereotype.

Narrator's Use of Humor

     P.D. James uses a very understated humor, which I think is a "British thing"; like some of the classic BBC sitcoms (As Time Goes By or Are You Being Served?). It's a little too subtle probably for most Americans, myself included. I think a good example is Bernie Pryde's final postscript in his suicide note: "If you find me alive, for God's sake wait before calling help" (16). It's dry- even a little morbid, but there is some humor in those being his choice of final words.

     In fact it is this death which James uses again in a deadpan (sorry) sort of way, when the secretary Mrs. Sparshott (and there's a funny name) leaves the scene. "Mrs. Sparshott had gone for good, violent death being a worse insult than a typewriter which a trained typist ought not to be expected to use or lavatory accommodation which was not at all what she had been accustomed to" (23). This is a bit of wry humor; a dig actually at a woman who would equate Pryde's suicide as just another inconvenience like the other two mentioned.

     You could say that finding the humor in this mystery takes a little detective work in itself. But it is there. When the client Elizabeth Leaming comes by, asking to see Mr. Pryde, Cordelia informs her that he is dead. The response is "Our information was that he was alive ten days ago. He must have died with remarkable speed and discretion" (31). No, it's not overtly funny; just a fairly light treatment of such a serious subject. That seems to be the gimmick in the three examples I found.

 

Final Subterfuge

     It's a very snap decision to cover the truth and form an alliance on the part of Cordelia and Miss Leaming- "We've got to work quickly and plan carefully. We have to trust each other and we have to be intelligent" (203). It's just minutes after the shooting and they commit to the subterfuge, which is indeed a dangerous risk should either of them change their mind. The trust between them is the most essential element of the plan working.

     I think they agree to all this because of a shared compassion for Mark. Cordelia rationalizes that Mark is dead; his father the killer is dead; so what good does it do for MIss Leaming to "lose" her life too in a prison cell. She asks "Is that what Mark himself would want?" (202). That seems to be the reason to carry out the ruse.

     While I can understand the motivation (especially Miss Leaming's) it seemed a bit of a stretch that Cordelia would lie to the police, fill out a false report, and even commit perjury under oath. And then that Miss Leaming would die too. Quite a set of coincidences, or as Dalgliesh says "Yes, it's all conveniently tidy" (249). I think it damages Cordelia's credibility and character.

rich_text    
Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content
rich_text    

Page Comments

No Comments

Add a New Comment:

You must be logged in to make comments on this page.